Skip to main content

Technology, humanities greatest achievement.... and possible downfall

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1BQPV-iCkU&feature=related

This video shows our possible future as we are becoming more dependent on technology. It starts now with Nomophobia which is a fear of being without your mobile phone. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2141169/The-biggest-phobia-world-Nomophobia--fear-mobile--affects-66-cent-us.html <-- This link suggests that 66% of everyone who has access to a mobile phone suffers from this phobia , making it the one of , if not the biggest phobia in the world ( which is why whenever I can , I turn my phone off and leave it in a separate room). The specific fears of this phobia are included in the link but I will list a few here : 1. Losing reception. 2. Running out of battery. 3. Losing sight of the phone itself ( most people just believe this part is related to the increasing costs of mobile devices, which is a valid argument in my opinion). The fact that it exists though is just sad for our current generation ( considering there are still kids starving in Africa or sold/forced into being soldiers , much bigger fears to handle in my opinion). I don't think technology is bad by any means however, I just believe we should lessen some dependence on it. Yes technology increases efficiency and raises our standard of living yes, but obviously there are adverse effects to that ( Nomophobia is just one example). Anyone reading this I challenge you to decrease whatever dependence you have on electronics , maybe read a paperback book instead of a digital copy , set a limit for how much tv you watch, read your local paper instead of checking online for news.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Election time sadness.

Here we are after eight years under President Obama getting ready to make a decision between bad and worse. I'm of course referring to our current predicament between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Let's break them down one at a time. Hillary Clinton: Pros:  Has the backing of several former Presidents something Trump lacks. Experience Incorporated good ideas of past opponents into her platform something Trump refuses to do. Rumors around Trump's campaign suggest Clinton's VP will be less powerful (which is a Pro considering VPs don't have to win primaries). Cons: Clinton's emails proved to the FBI that Clinton's negligence with her private server would constitute treason comparable to Edward Snowden, but the FBI mysteriously didn't suggest criminal charges. Clinton resided as the Secretary of State during the Benghazi crisis and seemed powerless or incompetent. Clinton's views on many different issues has flip-flopped over the yea...

My (late) thoughts on the election and campaign overall.

$1.6052 billion dollars spent on the 2012 presidential campaign just for an Incumbent to return, this is a great waste of money and absolutely screams to the USA that there needs to be some sort of campaign reform, super pacs and celebrities are now given more access to the candidates we the people elect than ever before just because of the enormous sums of money these groups can generate for a presidential candidate. This wasn't the peoples election, it was the 10%s election, and while I am pleased with the result of the campaign, money shouldn't determine the winner, and although I don't believe it did, some data from The New York Times gives some credence to the idea that the more money you have, the more likely you will win. Barack Obama raised $934 million and spent $852.9 million, in contrast Romney raised $881.8 million and *only* spent $752.3 million. Most peoples first question would be... where did the rest of that money go? The answer to that is simple, in Romne...

Why some Evolutionists are wrong... sort of....

In an evolution's theory on creation man evolved from other species which evolved from other species and so on and so forth... From a scientific view on creation life started in oceans and expanded to land, so lets go back billions of years to just before lifeforms were about to expand to land. Now lets assume there is an Anthropologist in this prehistoric time period who records various cultures creation myths.... he/she is on land and looks for any life on land but fails to find it, but sees what he/she perceives to be a blob in the water so he/she swims to this blob to see if the blob can convey it's cultures creation myth. The anthropologist begins to question this creature the first question being what their cultures creation myth is and the blob says there is no such creation myth, what he knows as creation is fact, the anthropologist says oh yes of course please tell me about it. The blob tells the anthropologist of the colliding planets and the development of single ce...