Skip to main content

Election time sadness.

Here we are after eight years under President Obama getting ready to make a decision between bad and worse. I'm of course referring to our current predicament between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Let's break them down one at a time.

Hillary Clinton:
Pros:
  •  Has the backing of several former Presidents something Trump lacks.
  • Experience
  • Incorporated good ideas of past opponents into her platform something Trump refuses to do.
  • Rumors around Trump's campaign suggest Clinton's VP will be less powerful (which is a Pro considering VPs don't have to win primaries).
Cons:
  • Clinton's emails proved to the FBI that Clinton's negligence with her private server would constitute treason comparable to Edward Snowden, but the FBI mysteriously didn't suggest criminal charges.
  • Clinton resided as the Secretary of State during the Benghazi crisis and seemed powerless or incompetent.
  • Clinton's views on many different issues has flip-flopped over the years and it seems to most voters that Clinton might just say anything if it gets her elected.
  • Clinton may have been conspiring with the DNC during the democratic primary, although it seems the DNC was acting on its own to prop up Clinton over democratic primary hopeful rival Bernie Sanders. 
  • Democrat.

Donald Trump
Pros:
  • Anti-establishment.
  • Is an excellent salesman, getting cities in the past to give him very long extensions on loans and extensions on paying taxes on real estate, with the constant gridlock between Congress and the White House in the past eight years this could be an incredibly useful skill for a President to possess. 
  • Trump has an incredibly strong stance on immigration and immigration reform.
  • Trump's business sense and understanding of business systems/banking may be helpful in foreign relations.
Cons:
  • Trump has also changed his position on certain politic issues in the past ten years and some of his views are still unclear.
  • Trump's strong immigration stance has occasionally gone too far, so much so that he insinuated an American born judge with Mexican heritage would be impartial due to his heritage and Trump has also suggested placing a ban on all Muslims coming into the United States.
  • Trump claims to be self-funded while accepting huge donations from wealthy donors.
  • Trump's VP may be leading the country (more on that here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-mike-pence_us_578fa289e4b0f180da63defd ).
  • Trump has on more than one occasion shown a penchant for sexism and racism.
  • Republican.
So, our choices seem to be between two habitual liars one of which is a liar and the other of which is a racist misogynist, but what if I told you there was a third option?

Gary Johnson
Pros: 
  • Not Trump or Hillary
  • Maintains a solid stance on political issues.
  • Wants to change several laws to reduce the number of Americans in prison, like legalizing marijuana.
  • A solid more logical middle ground between the extremes of the two parties.
Cons:
  • Anti-Vaccine which is scientifically baseless.
  • Doesn't have the major support or backing of the two major parties of our country.
  • Has an unfortunate last name which leads to some.... awkward[?] campaign slogans.

No matter who you decide to vote for though, do some research before you vote and go into your polling place informed about the candidate you are voting for on election day.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why some Evolutionists are wrong... sort of....

In an evolution's theory on creation man evolved from other species which evolved from other species and so on and so forth... From a scientific view on creation life started in oceans and expanded to land, so lets go back billions of years to just before lifeforms were about to expand to land. Now lets assume there is an Anthropologist in this prehistoric time period who records various cultures creation myths.... he/she is on land and looks for any life on land but fails to find it, but sees what he/she perceives to be a blob in the water so he/she swims to this blob to see if the blob can convey it's cultures creation myth. The anthropologist begins to question this creature the first question being what their cultures creation myth is and the blob says there is no such creation myth, what he knows as creation is fact, the anthropologist says oh yes of course please tell me about it. The blob tells the anthropologist of the colliding planets and the development of single cel
Post a Comment
Read more

The importance of networking

Have you ever gotten a job through another person? Think back to that experience and compare it to an experience in which you were not referred by another person. Ask your self a couple questions. Did you get the job in both situations? In which situation was the interview process easier? In which situation did you feel more comfortable? Which job was better?  While you mull those questions over. Let me discuss my employment experiences with you. My first job was at a Pizza Hut, no friend recommended me to the job, the store just desperately needed delivery drivers [delivery driving has a low retention rate as I'm sure you can imagine]. The delivery driving job paid minimum wage unless you were out on delivery on which it paid half minimum wage [plus tips] and was part-time work.  My second job was as a Peer Tutor at Gordon [State] College. I got the job, because I failed my English 1101 class. The class was at 7:00 a.m. on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and I was tired from
Post a Comment
Read more

Supreme Court cases everyone should know when discussing today's most pertinent issues.

             Let's start off with something that has slipped away as completely accepted in this day and age due to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on it just to show the colossal impact on society such decisions make.  Brown V. Board of Education (1954)~ Segregation of races in schools is inherently unequal and in violation of equal protection clause of the 14th amendment . Can any of my fellow Americans even imagine what this day and age would be like without this court case? When just 58 years before Plessy V. Ferguson (1896)  had said segregation is allowed when accommodations were separate as well as equal. White, let's call them supremacists, found a way around this "accommodations must be equal" clause of the ruling, by passing off second-hand textbooks and teachers with lower pass rates on to schools specifically geared toward teaching Black Americans.                Now, how about something a little more controversial, abortion. In Roe V. Wade   (1973)
Post a Comment
Read more